Difference between revisions of "User:Eluvatar"

{{{Name}}}
	[[image:{{{Avatar}}}\|125px\|Avatar of {{{Name}}}]]
	[[image:{{{Avatar}}}\|125px\|Avatar of {{{Name}}}]]
	Motto: Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes?'
Member since	{{{Member since}}}
Soapbox issue	{{{Soapbox issue}}}

Revision as of 13:26, 22 December 2007

A bad constitution is worse than no constitution.
1. An unreadable constitution is a bad constitution.
The essence of democracy is that the rights of the opposition are protected.
1. Any banning must always be given justification.
2. Simply having elections is not enough to be democratic.
Feeder democracy is possible.
NationStates is interesting for a wide array of reasons
1. Conflict for conflicts sake does not work at exciting interest
2. Conflict that happens naturally can excite interest but changes the nature of the parties involved

Revision as of 08:52, 17 March 2007 (view source) Eluvatar (Talk \| contribs) (Added convictions etc) ← Older edit	Revision as of 13:26, 22 December 2007 (view source) Korinn (Talk \| contribs) m (Protected "User:Eluvatar" [edit=autoconfirmed:move=autoconfirmed]) Newer edit →
(No difference)