Difference between revisions of "User:Eluvatar"
From Taijitu
(Created page) |
(Added convictions etc) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|NationState Type= Capitalist Paradise | |NationState Type= Capitalist Paradise | ||
|Political View= Liberal | |Political View= Liberal | ||
| + | |Soapbox Issue= Electoral Reform | ||
}} | }} | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==History== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==NationStates Convictions== | ||
| + | |||
| + | #A bad constitution is worse than no constitution. | ||
| + | ##An unreadable constitution is a bad constitution. | ||
| + | #The essence of democracy is that the rights of the opposition are protected. | ||
| + | ##Any banning must always be given justification. | ||
| + | ##Simply having elections is not enough to be democratic. | ||
| + | #Feeder democracy is possible. | ||
| + | #NationStates is interesting for a wide array of reasons | ||
| + | ##Conflict for conflicts sake does not work at exciting interest | ||
| + | ##Conflict that happens naturally can excite interest but changes the nature of the parties involved | ||
Revision as of 09:52, 17 March 2007
| {{{Name}}} | ||
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Motto: Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes?' | ||
| Member since | {{{Member since}}} | |
| Soapbox issue | {{{Soapbox issue}}} | |
History
NationStates Convictions
- A bad constitution is worse than no constitution.
- An unreadable constitution is a bad constitution.
- The essence of democracy is that the rights of the opposition are protected.
- Any banning must always be given justification.
- Simply having elections is not enough to be democratic.
- Feeder democracy is possible.
- NationStates is interesting for a wide array of reasons
- Conflict for conflicts sake does not work at exciting interest
- Conflict that happens naturally can excite interest but changes the nature of the parties involved
